2/14/2023 0 Comments Torrent bt dig search![]() Maybe the IPFS project should channel more work on building next to giants rather than doubling down and throwing away everything BT has to offer? IPFS is basically reinventing the wheel, but throwing out the round part. That would be the mix of torrents and web people want, not what IPFS is currently. Just from the IPFS point of view we could right now have embedded resources from torrents, tens of different clients available that could just be CDNs, existing seedboxes strengthening both swarms and probably much more. So much could be done that would strengthen both systems at the same time. It is simply a massive amount of wasted potential to ignore the thousands of terabytes of content the torrent system hosts, the work and services provided and spent for the ecosystem. Zero ounce of compatibility with the existing BT swarm. I think what I mentioned before, is the root cause. Unfortunately right now the IPFS project is totally ignoring that it's effectively nothing and takes nothing to the next level. The IPFS project has doubled down on it's effort of being more "advanced", "innovative" and "efficient" than BitTorrent, losing what actually makes people like torrents and distributed systems. Your comment kind-of shows the mentality I've seen with the IPFS project before. How is it "doubling down", they could exist side by side. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |